Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2626 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 5% better in Death Stranding than Core i7-3820 - 225 vs 215 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 65 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - CA$110.0 vs CA$145.0
- Up to 20% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i3-9100F - CA$0.51 vs CA$0.64 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
225
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.64/FPS
79%
Price, CA$
CA$145
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
215
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$110
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |