Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2094 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Dead Space than Ryzen 5 1400 - 164 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1400 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$87.08 vs CA$565.0
- Up to 83% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-13900F - CA$0.59 vs CA$3.45 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
164
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.45/FPS
17%
Price, CA$
CA$565
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$565 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11666 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
148
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.08
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11660 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |