Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 29% better in Battlefield IV than FX-8300 - 480 vs 371 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$83.46 vs CA$474.95
- Up to 78% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-13900F - CA$0.22 vs CA$0.99 per FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
480
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.99/FPS
22%
Price, CA$
CA$474.95
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$474.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
371
77%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |