Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2682 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 81% better in FIFA 23 than Core i3-6100 - 263 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$140.0 vs CA$565.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i9-13900F - CA$0.97 vs CA$2.15 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
263
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.15/FPS
45%
Price, CA$
CA$565
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$565 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10750 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
145
55%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$140
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10742 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |