Buy on Amazon
CA$529.18
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $524
Availability
MSRP in USD: $524
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1352 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 10% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-9100F - 148 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$138.62 vs CA$529.18
- Up to 71% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-13900F - CA$1.03 vs CA$3.58 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
148
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.58/FPS
28%
Price, CA$
CA$529.18
26%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-13900F Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) 36MB Cache, up to 5.6 GHz
Buy for CA$529.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
135
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.03/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$138.62
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-9100F Desktop Processor 4 Core Up to 4.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W, BX80684I39100F
Buy for CA$138.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
