Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 461 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - CA$145.0 vs CA$425.0
- Up to 63% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i9-10850K - CA$0.21 vs CA$0.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 6% better in Minecraft than Core i3-9100F - 744 vs 704 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 20 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
704
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$145
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
744
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.57/FPS
36%
Price, CA$
CA$425
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$425 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |