Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 373 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - CA$138.88 vs CA$330.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-10700K - CA$1.14 vs CA$2.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 2% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-9100F - 125 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
122
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.14/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$138.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$138.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18555 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.64/FPS
43%
Price, CA$
CA$330
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$330 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18554 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |