Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8350K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8350K is 565 days older than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i3-8350K - CA$138.88 vs CA$318.88
- Up to 56% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i3-8350K - CA$0.2 vs CA$0.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i3-8350K - 65 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Performs up to 2% better in Minecraft than Core i3-9100F - 715 vs 704 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
704
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$138.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$138.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17566 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
715
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.45/FPS
44%
Price, CA$
CA$318.88
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$318.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17565 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i3-8350K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |