Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700K outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700K and the more expensive Core i9-10900F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 0% better in Ready or Not than Core i9-10900F - 275 vs 274 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - CA$330.0 vs CA$388.0
- Up to 15% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i9-10900F - CA$1.2 vs CA$1.42 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
275
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$330
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$330 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18833 minutes ago
Buy for CA$388 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18833 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |