Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 663 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 5% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 137 vs 130 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$514.74 vs CA$552.98
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10850K - 24 vs 20 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$514.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
130
94.8905109489051%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$552.98
93%
Buy for CA$552.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
73.2183908045977%
Multi-Core
7454
81.948109058927%
Intel Core i9-10850K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |