Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700K is 575 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700K - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 6% better in Remnant II than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 91 vs 86 FPS
- Up to 68% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$330.0 vs CA$1034.88
- Up to 70% better value when playing Remnant II than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$3.63 vs CA$12.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
86
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$12.03/FPS
30%
Price, CA$
CA$1034.88
31%
Buy for CA$1,034.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
91
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.63/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$330
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$330 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Colfax | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |