Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 418 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 12% better in Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 63 vs 56 FPS
- Up to 17% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$895.0 vs CA$1074.19
- Up to 26% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$14.21 vs CA$19.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 105 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 32 vs 24 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
56
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$19.18/FPS
74%
Price, CA$
CA$1074.19
83%
Buy for CA$1,074.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5903 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
63
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$14.21/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$895
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$895 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5903 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Colfax | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 105 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |