Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1554 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$1074.19 vs CA$1221.74
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 15% better in Lost Ark than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 289 vs 252 FPS
- Up to 1% better value when playing Lost Ark than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$4.23 vs CA$4.26 per FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
252
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.26/FPS
99%
Price, CA$
CA$1074.19
100%
Buy for CA$1,074.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17032 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
289
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.23/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1221.74
87%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,221.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17031 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Colfax | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |