Buy on Amazon
CA$506.51
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - CA$506.51 vs CA$789.0
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 18% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-10700K - 162 vs 137 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700K - 32 vs 16 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Intel Core i7-10700K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.1 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W (BX8070110700K)
Buy for CA$506.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74460 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-14900 Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) up to 5.8 GHz
Buy for CA$789 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74459 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i7-10700K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i9-14900
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-10700K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1706
57.90902919212492%
Multi-Core
8142
51.3269873290046%
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 24 |
| 16 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
