Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3960X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700K is 3090 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3960X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 7% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-3960X - 138 vs 129 FPS
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i7-3960X - CA$471.24 vs CA$1045.69
- Up to 58% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-3960X - CA$3.41 vs CA$8.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-3960X - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3960X - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
138
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.41/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$471.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$471.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
Buy for CA$1,045.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | Intel Core i7-3960X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |