Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 277 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 167 vs 159 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$635.0 vs CA$1074.19
- Up to 44% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$3.8 vs CA$6.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 105 vs 180 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
159
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.76/FPS
56%
Price, CA$
CA$1074.19
59%
Buy for CA$1,074.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10756 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
167
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.8/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$635
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$635 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10756 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Colfax | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 105 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |