Buy on Amazon
CA$564.18
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $524
Availability
MSRP in USD: $524
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4440 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3412 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4440.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 21% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-4440 - 153 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4440 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4440
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$77.09 vs CA$564.18
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i9-13900F Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) 36MB Cache, up to 5.6 GHz
Buy for CA$564.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75771 minutes ago
Intel Core I5-4440 I5 4440 3.1 GHz Used Quad-Core CPU Processor 6M 84W LGA 1150
Buy for CA$77.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75773 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Core i5-4440
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-4440
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
1033
37.83882783882784%
Multi-Core
2902
16.85347581160346%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-4440 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 84 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
