Buy on Amazon
CA$519.18
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $524
Availability
MSRP in USD: $524
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7500T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7500T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7500T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 15% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-7500T - 136 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$98.89 vs CA$519.18
- Up to 78% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-13900F - CA$0.84 vs CA$3.82 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
136
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.82/FPS
21%
Price, CA$
CA$519.18
19%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-13900F Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) 36MB Cache, up to 5.6 GHz
Buy for CA$519.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
Core i5-7500T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
118
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.89
100%
Value Winner
Intel BX80677I57500T 7th Generation Intel Core i5-7500T Processor
Buy for CA$98.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Core i5-7500T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
