Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-11900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 5% better in Resident Evil 4 than Core i9-11900K - 209 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900K - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$400.0 vs CA$474.95
- Up to 11% better value when playing Resident Evil 4 than Core i9-13900F - CA$2.01 vs CA$2.27 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
209
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.27/FPS
88%
Price, CA$
CA$474.95
84%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$474.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
199
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.01/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$400
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$400 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |