Buy on Amazon
CA$73
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7500T outperforms the more expensive FX-8370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7500T is 854 days newer than the more expensive FX-8370.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Performs up to 98% better in Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than FX-8370 - 85 vs 43 FPS
- Up to 85% cheaper than FX-8370 - CA$73.0 vs CA$480.74
- Up to 92% better value when playing Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than FX-8370 - CA$0.86 vs CA$11.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 8 vs 4 threads
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-7500T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
85
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.86/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel BX80677I57500T 7th Generation Intel Core i5-7500T Processor
Buy for CA$73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
FX-8370
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
43
50.588235294117645%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$11.18/FPS
7.6923076923076925%
Price, CA$
CA$480.74
15%
AMD FX-8370 Black Edition 8 Core CPU Processor AM3+ 4300Mhz 125W 16MB FD8370FRHKBOX
Buy for CA$480.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-7500T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FX-8370
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7500T | vs | AMD FX-8370 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
