Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-12100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-12100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 344 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-12100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-12100F - 260 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$109.0 vs CA$519.18
- Up to 78% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-13900F - CA$0.43 vs CA$2.0 per FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
260
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2/FPS
21%
Price, CA$
CA$519.18
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$519.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
253
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$109
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$109 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 58 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |