Buy on Amazon
CA$214.29
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $434
Availability
MSRP in USD: $434
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 672 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 5% better in DOOM Eternal than Celeron G4900 - 481 vs 456 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-6800K - CA$49.99 vs CA$214.29
- Up to 76% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Core i7-6800K - CA$0.11 vs CA$0.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Core i7-6800K
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
481
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.45/FPS
24%
Price, CA$
CA$214.29
23%
FPS Winner
Intel BX80671I76800K Boxed Core i7-6800K Processor, Gray
Buy for CA$214.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
456
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.11/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Core i7-6800K
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Broadwell-E | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 140 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
