Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12500 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12500 is 2044 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i5-12500 - CA$188.88 vs CA$249.99
- Up to 13% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-12500 - CA$0.81 vs CA$0.93 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 15% better in Battlefield V than Core i7-6800K - 270 vs 234 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
234
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$188.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13609 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
270
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.93/FPS
87%
Price, CA$
CA$249.99
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$249.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13609 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | Intel Core i5-12500 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |