Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Celeron G3900 vs FX-8350

Celeron G3900 vs FX-8350: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1043 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.

Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900

  • Performs up to 1% better in Lost Ark than FX-8350 - 227 vs 224 FPS
  • Up to 68% cheaper than FX-8350 - CA$67.21 vs CA$209.7
  • Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 51 vs 125 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics

Advantages of AMD FX-8350

  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
This is a free version of Lost Ark.
Lost Ark

Lost Ark

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Very High

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


FPS

227

100%

Value, CA$/FPS

Price, CA$

CA$67.21

100%

FPS Winner

INTEL - CELERON Processor G3900 2M 2.80

Buy for CA$67.21 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 244 minutes ago

AMD FX-8350 Logo
FX-8350

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012


FPS

224

98.6784140969163%

Value, CA$/FPS

Price, CA$

CA$209.7

32%

AMD FD8350FRHKBOX FX-8350 FX-Series 8-Core Black Edition

Buy for CA$209.7 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 244 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Very High

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015

AMD FX-8350 Logo
FX-8350

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


Single-Core

581

100%

Multi-Core

992

49.72431077694235%

AMD FX-8350 Logo
FX-8350

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012


Single-Core

488

83.99311531841653%

Multi-Core

1995

100%

Intel Celeron G3900

vs

AMD FX-8350

Sep 1st, 2015
Release DateOct 23rd, 2012
CeleronCollectionFX
SkylakeCodenameVishera
Intel Socket 1151SocketAMD Socket AM3+
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2Cores
8
2Threads
8
2.8 GHzBase Clock Speed
4.0 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock Speed4.2 GHz
51 W
TDP125 W
14 nm
Process Size32 nm
28.0x
Multiplier20.0x
Intel HD 510
Integrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockable
Yes

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.