Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1773 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 57% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$83.46 vs CA$194.24
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield 2042 than FX-8300 - 157 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 16 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 338 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
157
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$194.24
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$194.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 339 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |