Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - CA$83.46 vs CA$196.23
- Up to 47% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-11400F - CA$0.73 vs CA$1.38 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 23% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8300 - 142 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
115
80%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.73/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14596 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
142
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.38/FPS
52%
Price, CA$
CA$196.23
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$196.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14596 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |