Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3719 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 22% better in Battlefield V than Core i5-2500 - 258 vs 212 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - CA$54.96 vs CA$174.32
- Up to 62% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-11400F - CA$0.26 vs CA$0.68 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
258
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.68/FPS
38%
Price, CA$
CA$174.32
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$174.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1368 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
212
82%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$54.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$54.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1368 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i5-2500 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |