Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 29% better in World of Warcraft than FX-6300 - 200 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - CA$59.57 vs CA$196.23
- Up to 61% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i5-11400F - CA$0.38 vs CA$0.98 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
200
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.98/FPS
38%
Price, CA$
CA$196.23
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$196.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1923 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
155
77%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$59.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1923 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |