Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 2935 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 56% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600X - CA$83.46 vs CA$189.0
- Up to 31% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 5 5600X - CA$1.9 vs CA$2.74 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 57% better in Starfield than FX-8300 - 69 vs 44 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
44
63%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.9/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 320 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
69
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.74/FPS
69%
Price, CA$
CA$189
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$189 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 321 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |