Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 2004 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 42% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - CA$83.46 vs CA$142.72
- Up to 40% better value when playing Rocket League than Ryzen 5 2600 - CA$0.12 vs CA$0.2 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 5% better in Rocket League than FX-8300 - 704 vs 673 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
673
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
704
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.2/FPS
60%
Price, CA$
CA$142.72
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$142.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |