Buy on Amazon
CA$66.77
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is 2828 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - CA$66.77 vs CA$251.12
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Performs up to 11% better in Elden Ring than FX-8300 - 123 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
AMD FX-8300 FX 8300 FX8300 3.3 GHz Eight-Core 8M Processor Socket AM3+ CPU 95W Bulk Package FX-8300
Buy for CA$66.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74971 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G Processor 7nm 3.7Ghz 6 cores 12 Threads Processor only (Tray)
Buy for CA$251.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74971 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Renoir |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
