Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i5-11400 - CA$83.46 vs CA$214.99
- Up to 55% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-11400 - CA$0.22 vs CA$0.49 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 19% better in Battlefield IV than FX-8300 - 440 vs 371 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
371
84%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15388 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
440
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.49/FPS
44%
Price, CA$
CA$214.99
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$214.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15388 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |