Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2448 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - CA$83.46 vs CA$315.0
- Up to 68% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 7 3700X - CA$0.55 vs CA$1.74 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 20% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8300 - 181 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 16 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
151
83%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
181
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.74/FPS
31%
Price, CA$
CA$315
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |