Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 177 days older than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i7-3770 - CA$83.46 vs CA$104.99
- Up to 18% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-3770 - CA$0.73 vs CA$0.89 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8300 - 118 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
115
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.73/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6943 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
118
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.89/FPS
82%
Price, CA$
CA$104.99
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$104.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6943 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 77 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |