Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2268 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - CA$83.46 vs CA$153.88
- Up to 40% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i5-9400F - CA$0.53 vs CA$0.88 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 11% better in No Man's Sky than FX-8300 - 174 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
157
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13369 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
174
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.88/FPS
60%
Price, CA$
CA$153.88
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$153.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13370 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |