Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium Gold G6405 outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium Gold G6405 is 3066 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Performs up to 4% better in Apex Legends than FX-8300 - 265 vs 256 FPS
- Up to 13% cheaper than FX-8300 - CA$72.43 vs CA$83.46
- Up to 18% better value when playing Apex Legends than FX-8300 - CA$0.27 vs CA$0.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 58 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13563 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
265
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$72.43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$72.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13562 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |