Buy on Amazon
CA$101.54
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $132
Availability
MSRP in USD: $132
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1752 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$101.54 vs CA$360.9
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 11% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than FX-6300 - 169 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 24 vs 6 threads
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
AMD FD6300WMHKBOX FX-6300 6-Core Processor Black Edition
Buy for CA$101.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 250 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
169
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$360.9
28%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X (12-core/24-thread) Desktop Processor (YD192XA8AEWOF)
Buy for CA$360.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 251 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Vishera | Codename | Whitehaven |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 6 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
