Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 4094 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - CA$66.51 vs CA$463.99
- Up to 83% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-14700F - CA$0.57 vs CA$3.44 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 16% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than FX-6300 - 135 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 28 vs 6 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
116
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$66.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78249 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
135
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.44/FPS
16%
Price, CA$
CA$463.99
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$463.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78248 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 20 |
6 | Threads | 28 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |