Buy on Amazon
CA$59.57
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $132
Availability
MSRP in USD: $132
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2373 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - CA$59.57 vs CA$104.99
- Up to 39% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-9100F - CA$0.22 vs CA$0.36 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 7% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-6300 - 293 vs 274 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
274
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$59.57
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-6300 CPU Used 6-Core 6-Thread Desktop Processor 3.5 GHz 8M 95W Socket AM3+
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
293
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.36/FPS
61%
Price, CA$
CA$104.99
56%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i3-9100F Desktop Processor 4 Core Up to 4.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W, BX80684I39100F
Buy for CA$104.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Core i3 |
| Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
