Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700 is 2373 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-9700 - CA$59.57 vs CA$262.38
- Up to 76% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i7-9700 - CA$0.41 vs CA$1.71 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than FX-6300 - 153 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
145
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$59.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
153
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.71/FPS
23%
Price, CA$
CA$262.38
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$262.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |