Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 2187 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-9700K - CA$66.51 vs CA$363.04
- Up to 77% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i7-9700K - CA$0.55 vs CA$2.39 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 26% better in Far Cry 3 than FX-6300 - 152 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
121
79%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$66.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6463 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
152
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.39/FPS
23%
Price, CA$
CA$363.04
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$363.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6468 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |