Buy on Amazon
CA$66.51
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $132
Availability
MSRP in USD: $132
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 2004 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 82% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - CA$66.51 vs CA$360.96
- Up to 79% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Ryzen 7 2700X - CA$0.37 vs CA$1.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 15% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than FX-6300 - 205 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
178
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.51
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-6300 CPU Used 6-Core 6-Thread Desktop Processor 3.5 GHz 8M 95W Socket AM3+
Buy for CA$66.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6461 minutes ago
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
205
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.76/FPS
21%
Price, CA$
CA$360.96
18%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Processor with Wraith Prism LED Cooler - YD270XBGAFBOX
Buy for CA$360.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6466 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Vishera | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 6 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
