Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 97% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$59.57 vs CA$1952.53
- Up to 96% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than Core i5-13400F - CA$0.56 vs CA$12.93 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 41% better in Grand Theft Auto V than FX-6300 - 151 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
107
70%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$59.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
151
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$12.93/FPS
4%
Price, CA$
CA$1952.53
3%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,952.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |