Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - CA$66.51 vs CA$400.1
- Up to 72% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Core i9-11900K - CA$0.72 vs CA$2.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 67% better in Far Cry 6 than FX-6300 - 154 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
92
59%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$66.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6457 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
154
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.6/FPS
27%
Price, CA$
CA$400.1
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$400.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6465 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |