Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 4094 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i5-14400 - CA$59.57 vs CA$351.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-14400 - CA$0.66 vs CA$2.79 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 40% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-6300 - 126 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
90
71%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$59.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
126
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.79/FPS
23%
Price, CA$
CA$351
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$351 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |