Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 2564 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 77% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-6100 - 401 vs 226 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i7-9700K - CA$98.43 vs CA$317.88
- Up to 44% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-9700K - CA$0.44 vs CA$0.79 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
401
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.79/FPS
55%
Price, CA$
CA$317.88
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$317.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
226
56%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700K | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |