Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - CA$66.51 vs CA$588.49
- Up to 83% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-13700F - CA$0.37 vs CA$2.24 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 48% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than FX-6300 - 263 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 24 vs 6 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
178
67%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$66.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6331 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
263
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.24/FPS
16%
Price, CA$
CA$588.49
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$588.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6340 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |