Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Xeon W3550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 1807 days newer than Xeon W3550.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3550
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 3% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon W3550 - 119 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon W3550 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3550 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon W3550
Server/Workstation • Aug 9th, 2009
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3550 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
