Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v3 outperforms Xeon W3550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v3 is 1856 days newer than Xeon W3550.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3550
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 130 vs 135 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Performs up to 7% better in Lost Ark than Xeon W3550 - 240 vs 224 FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon W3550
Server/Workstation • Aug 9th, 2009
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3550 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 135 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
