Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Xeon W3550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 1856 days newer than Xeon W3550.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 3% better in Fortnite than Xeon W3550 - 220 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Xeon W3550 - 120 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3550 - 24 vs 8 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Aug 9th, 2009
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3550 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
---|---|---|
Aug 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Xeon | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 120 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |